Tenma-Villain or Antagonist?
Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 2:54 pm
I think it's safe to say that Tenma is one of the most popular characters in Astro Boy. And for good reason; he's a very human character.
Regardless of what version you look at, he always comes off as being a morally ambiguous character. That being said, he was always a minor character despite that position, and really did not rise to main cast member status until the 2003 series. In fact, while we all have varying opinions on which version of Astro Boy we love, I think it's safe to say that everyone (including myself) agrees that Tenma is one of the best things about the 2003 series. He is crafted into such a sympathetic character, that it's hard not to get involved in his story despite his position as the antagonist.
But that's the thing; just HOW much of Tenma is villainous? And how much of him is an antagonist? Both words have very different meanings, and either could apply to Tenma's character.
That's really what I want to look at today; Is Tenma a villain? Or is he an antagonist?
I personally lean a tad bit more towards the antagonist side of things, though I do believe that he falls somewhere in between. Let me try to explain.
The defenition of antagonist is as follows; One who opposes and contends against another; an adversary. I feel that this defenition really works with Tenma in the 2003 series, as he naturally opposes both Astro and Ochanomizu's ideologies, and is proactively seeking out ways to ensure that Astro fall in line with his own goals. At the same time, I would argue that Tenma is an antagonist simply due to one other thing; he is genuinely sympathetic.
His entire "Robot Dmination" tactics or maipulation of his own child didn't come out of some desireable need to rule over people, he was left guilt ridden and alone. And the more he saw his mistakes (in both his life, and robotic evolution), the more mentally unstable he became. He treats hisnown goals and motives as if it's just given that robots will become more superior to man, and that he is justified in escalating the conflict. Heck, you could probably make the argument that Tenma may just want robot domination because he probably believes that robots won't leave him alone, and that he's just trying to win his son's love back.
However, we also have to look at the villain side of things as well.
The defenition for a villain is as follows; a wicked or malevolent person. While I feel that Tenma is genuinely sympathetic, that does not mean that I feel he's above garnering any villain status. After all, he gets away with quite a lot in the 2003 series up until the finale. He brainwashes/hacks robots to do his bidding, he's not above hurting robots to meet his goals, and he's a master manipulator. Although, I would make the argument that Tenma's actions only grow more villanous the more desperate he gets. The episode right before the finale is defenitely an indication, though the one I always like to cite is the Steel Island episode. Not only does he manipulate Drake/Lamp to attack a robot ship out of desperate improvisation just to get Astro, Astro almost early attacks the humans on ship, something he'd been resiliant to do up until that moment.
Anyway, that's my argument. But now, I want to know what you guys think.
Regardless of what version you look at, he always comes off as being a morally ambiguous character. That being said, he was always a minor character despite that position, and really did not rise to main cast member status until the 2003 series. In fact, while we all have varying opinions on which version of Astro Boy we love, I think it's safe to say that everyone (including myself) agrees that Tenma is one of the best things about the 2003 series. He is crafted into such a sympathetic character, that it's hard not to get involved in his story despite his position as the antagonist.
But that's the thing; just HOW much of Tenma is villainous? And how much of him is an antagonist? Both words have very different meanings, and either could apply to Tenma's character.
That's really what I want to look at today; Is Tenma a villain? Or is he an antagonist?
I personally lean a tad bit more towards the antagonist side of things, though I do believe that he falls somewhere in between. Let me try to explain.
The defenition of antagonist is as follows; One who opposes and contends against another; an adversary. I feel that this defenition really works with Tenma in the 2003 series, as he naturally opposes both Astro and Ochanomizu's ideologies, and is proactively seeking out ways to ensure that Astro fall in line with his own goals. At the same time, I would argue that Tenma is an antagonist simply due to one other thing; he is genuinely sympathetic.
His entire "Robot Dmination" tactics or maipulation of his own child didn't come out of some desireable need to rule over people, he was left guilt ridden and alone. And the more he saw his mistakes (in both his life, and robotic evolution), the more mentally unstable he became. He treats hisnown goals and motives as if it's just given that robots will become more superior to man, and that he is justified in escalating the conflict. Heck, you could probably make the argument that Tenma may just want robot domination because he probably believes that robots won't leave him alone, and that he's just trying to win his son's love back.
However, we also have to look at the villain side of things as well.
The defenition for a villain is as follows; a wicked or malevolent person. While I feel that Tenma is genuinely sympathetic, that does not mean that I feel he's above garnering any villain status. After all, he gets away with quite a lot in the 2003 series up until the finale. He brainwashes/hacks robots to do his bidding, he's not above hurting robots to meet his goals, and he's a master manipulator. Although, I would make the argument that Tenma's actions only grow more villanous the more desperate he gets. The episode right before the finale is defenitely an indication, though the one I always like to cite is the Steel Island episode. Not only does he manipulate Drake/Lamp to attack a robot ship out of desperate improvisation just to get Astro, Astro almost early attacks the humans on ship, something he'd been resiliant to do up until that moment.
Anyway, that's my argument. But now, I want to know what you guys think.