Originally posted by dannavy85@Sep 24 2005, 06:00 PM
[b]If they are liars, exhibate lies. Otherwise don't throw biased assertions.
Much of what these two have been writing about has already been debunked by the mainstream media. People like this have an expressed agenda and as always people such as these will do or say anything to help their agenda.[/b]
My fault. I had thought it was evident I didn't request you to give them on this forum. Are you aware this forum is not politically oriented? Astro forever has already linked to the discussion about political discussions, so I won't repeat it. I find strange by the way you still haven't seen it

If I wanted to discuss about politics in a forum where I am aware that so many people have voted and argumented against, I would at least try to explain why I do that, not you?
About what you said, I don't see any credible argument. Moreover, "debunked by the mainstream media" is an expression that puzzles me: I have a natural defience for the "mainstream media", as they are usually the preferred way for propaganda, whatever the country. As for the "expressed agenda", I would like you to name only ONE publicly politically oriented person who does not have one. By definition, they have one, otherwise they wouldn't be in politics.
Insted of such lame and wishful thinking research into how to stop a hurricane, which is folly, perhaps we should put all our resources into toughening up areas, revitalizing natural defensive fronts such as swamps, marshlands and forests. Prepositioning emergency response equipment aboard all the retired Navy ships we have in America.
The initial question was whether it was possible or not. Obviously, 2 people have said it wasn't. Why is it necessary to rant about people who do researches about this in this forum? Will it make realize they should stop? It would be far more efficient if you told them directly instead of ranting here.