Page 1 of 3

personalities?

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 3:48 pm
by CommanderEVE
whats you perosnalitie?

http://www.typelogic.com/
http://www.okcupid.com/tests/take
http://similarminds.com/pref_jung.html
i would say that the last one is the best :)

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 7:34 am
by DrFrag
I'm ISTJ.

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 5:09 pm
by CommanderEVE
i'm a ISFJ
Introverted Sensing Feeling Judging
your smilmler to me DrFrag :)

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 5:12 pm
by fafner
Don't know... Maybe I missed something but too many questions seem not to apply to me :confused:

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 5:26 pm
by CommanderEVE
there is other tests :)

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 5:41 pm
by fafner
I don't like tests very much, I end up not knowing what to answer, even to simple answers...
For example:
"I prefer to be firm with others." : It depends who I am facing.
"I am social." : Again it depends.
"I prefer to interact." : Huh? :confused: With what/who? :unsure: With people? I suppose according to the context, but I am definitely not sure... And "interact" is rather broad to me, and can encompass virtually anything.
"I prefer to be random." : Not sure what it means.

Ok, that will be enough flaming down the poor thing :p

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 5:53 pm
by CommanderEVE
"fafner" wrote:I don't like tests very much, I end up not knowing what to answer, even to simple answers...
For example:
"I prefer to be firm with others." : It depends who I am facing.
"I am social." : Again it depends.
"I prefer to interact." : Huh? :confused: With what/who? :unsure: With people? I suppose according to the context, but I am definitely not sure... And "interact" is rather broad to me, and can encompass virtually anything.
"I prefer to be random." : Not sure what it means.



you have got a good point there, i never thought of it like that.

"fafner" wrote:Ok, that will be enough flaming down the poor thing :p


XD

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 6:20 pm
by fafner
"Sparx" wrote:you have got a good point there, i never thought of it like that.

The point is that these tests must reduce psychological profiles to a limited set (even 256 is rather low). There must be imprecisions and it seems I often fall into the gaps :shifty:

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:44 pm
by CommanderEVE
"fafner" wrote:The point is that these tests must reduce psychological profiles to a limited set (even 256 is rather low). There must be imprecisions and it seems I often fall into the gaps :shifty:


true, it's like one of those yes and no things you'll get at the back page of one of those girly mags :lol: it only leads to about 6 awesers :d evil: or in this cast to a machine that gives awesers near the critera. it's like a hoilday seach, you put in the information and it rounds it up to a aweser. right?

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 9:09 pm
by fafner
"Sparx" wrote:true, it's like one of those yes and no things you'll get at the back page of one of those girly mags :lol: it only leads to about 6 awesers :d evil: or in this cast to a machine that gives awesers near the critera. it's like a hoilday seach, you put in the information and it rounds it up to a aweser. right?

Or like those horoscopes that give roughly 12 different possible fates for 6 billions persons :eek: Although I admit that the psychological test is probably better aimed since it is not based on complete random :p