"The Hobbit" is one of my all-time favorite books, but I have never been able to get though "Lord of the Rings." I'm not a huge fan of Middle Earth itself, which is why The Hobbit has more appeal. It's less about the world and more about seeing a wider world through the eyes of a very sheltered traveler. That's another reason I was so bored during the movie, it was more Middle Earth Stuff and less Hobbit Experiencing Middle Earth for the First Time. It might seem like a slight difference, but to me it's very distinct.
Then I feel kinda bad, because books like The Simarillion were his life's work, and he spent so much time etching so much world-building detail into LOTR, and I'm all like, "yeah, this is super boring. I wanna read the one where the dog turns into a toy." And everyone else is like, "Wait, what book is that?" And I go, "ROVERANDOM, PEOPLE. It's like the best book ever written on the subject of dogs who turn into things." And they say, "Um, yeah, he spent like half a century on Middle Earth. It's basically a real place now, he put so much detail into it." And I'm like "what-EV-ah. I'm-a read Farmer Giles of Ham again." And they just shake their heads and wonder what's wrong with me and on some level, I do too.
Did any of our users who were around in the late 80s ever play
War in Middle Earth?
When me and my brother were little, he had that PC game, that was essentially you watching a little dot that blinked as it slooooowly made its way across Middle Earth, and also some armies are somewhere. I don't know, I was three. When my brother got kicked off the computer, he tried to teach me how to act it with him. He made me pick a character and rattled off a list of names. I picked Frodo, and he said, "Okay, you have to walk across like this and then at the end you lose your finger." "Which one?" I asked. "I dunno," he said, "it doesn't matter." And then we started pretending we had lost different fingers.